At-Bay vs Curant.ai
At-Bay vs Curant.ai, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Curant.ai on 42/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 359 against 4
- funding raised: $292M against $3.1M
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 91
Curant.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Curant.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | An AI-powered platform transforming insurance claims through modern AI, designed to modernize insurance operations, reduce costs, and improve customer outcomes while ensuring compliance. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Artificial Intelligence, AI Agent, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | St. George, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Curant.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $3.1M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 91 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Curant.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 52/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 1/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Curant.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Curant.ai: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Curant.ai?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Curant.ai compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (61/100 against 1/100), headcount (359 against 4), funding raised ($292M against $3.1M), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 91).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Curant.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.