At-Bay vs Crawford & Company
At-Bay vs Crawford & Company, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Crawford & Company on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 22/100
Crawford & Company
- domain rating: 69/100 against 62/100
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Crawford & Company |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Global provider of claims management and outsourcing solutions. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | Claims Management, Insurance Services, Outsourcing, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2016 | 1941 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Atlanta, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Crawford & Company |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Crawford & Company |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Crawford & Company |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Crawford & Company: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Crawford & Company?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Crawford & Company compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 22/100). Crawford & Company leads on domain rating (69/100 against 62/100).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Crawford & Company review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.