At-Bay vs Cowbell Cyber
At-Bay vs Cowbell Cyber, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Cowbell Cyber on 56/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $292M against $103M
Cowbell Cyber
- LinkedIn following: 30,472 against 20,419
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Cowbell Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Cybersecurity insurance provider leveraging AI for advanced risk assessment. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2016 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Cowbell Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 367 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $103M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 30,472 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Cowbell Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 72/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Cowbell Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Cowbell Cyber: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Cowbell Cyber?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Cowbell Cyber compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($292M against $103M). Cowbell Cyber leads on LinkedIn following (30,472 against 20,419).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Cowbell Cyber review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.