At-Bay vs CoverX AI
At-Bay vs CoverX AI, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and CoverX AI on 31/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 14/100
- funding raised: $292M against $25K
CoverX AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | CoverX AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | AI-powered platform for independent retail commercial property and casualty insurance agents. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Commercial Insurance, AI Tools & Apps, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | CoverX AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $25K |
| Latest round | Series D | Other |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | CoverX AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 31/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 22/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 42/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 14/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | CoverX AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Lovable |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs CoverX AI: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or CoverX AI?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and CoverX AI compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 31/100), domain rating (61/100 against 14/100), funding raised ($292M against $25K).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the CoverX AI review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.