At-Bay vs Corvus Insurance
At-Bay vs Corvus Insurance, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Corvus Insurance on 54/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 37/100
- headcount: 359 against 93
- headcount growth: +18.9% against -16.4%
- funding raised: $292M against $114M
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 15,273
Corvus Insurance
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Corvus Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Corvus by Travelers provides specialized cyber insurance and tech E&O solutions, leveraging data and AI for risk assessment and incident response. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Parametric Insurance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Corvus Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 93 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | -16.4% |
| Total funding | $292M | $114M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 15,273 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Corvus Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Corvus Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Corvus Insurance: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Corvus Insurance?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Corvus Insurance compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 37/100), headcount (359 against 93), headcount growth (+18.9% against -16.4%), funding raised ($292M against $114M), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 15,273).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Corvus Insurance review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.