At-Bay vs Corgi Insurance
At-Bay vs Corgi Insurance, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Corgi Insurance on 68/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- domain rating: 61/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 359 against 148
Corgi Insurance
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Corgi Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | An AI-native insurance carrier built for startups. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Artificial Intelligence, Financial Services, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Corgi Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 148 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $268M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 21,332 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Corgi Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Corgi Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Payments | Not detected | Apple PAY |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | At-Bay | Corgi Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
At-Bay vs Corgi Insurance: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Corgi Insurance?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 68/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Corgi Insurance compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on domain rating (61/100 against 47/100), headcount (359 against 148). Corgi Insurance leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 48/100).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Corgi Insurance review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.