At-Bay vs Concirrus
At-Bay vs Concirrus, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Concirrus on 53/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 27/100
- headcount: 359 against 63
- funding raised: $292M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 20,419 against 10,948
Concirrus
- headcount growth: +53.4% against +18.9%
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Concirrus |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Data analytics platform for the global insurance industry, leveraging AI for risk assessment and pricing. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Data Platform, Analytics Platform, AI-Driven Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Concirrus |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 63 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | +53.4% |
| Total funding | $292M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 10,948 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Concirrus |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Concirrus |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Concirrus: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Concirrus?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Concirrus compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 39/100), domain rating (61/100 against 27/100), headcount (359 against 63), funding raised ($292M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (20,419 against 10,948). Concirrus leads on headcount growth (+53.4% against +18.9%).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Concirrus review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.