At-Bay vs Coalition
At-Bay vs Coalition, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Coalition on 61/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 37/100
- headcount growth: +18.9% against -17.4%
Coalition
- domain rating: 74/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 709 against 359
- LinkedIn following: 211,765 against 20,419
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Coalition |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Coalition provides active insurance and cybersecurity solutions to prevent and respond to cyber risk. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Coalition |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 709 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | -17.4% |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 211,765 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Coalition |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Coalition |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Coalition: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Coalition?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Coalition compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 37/100), headcount growth (+18.9% against -17.4%). Coalition leads on domain rating (74/100 against 61/100), headcount (709 against 359), LinkedIn following (211,765 against 20,419).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Coalition review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.