At-Bay vs Cityradar
At-Bay vs Cityradar, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and Cityradar on 10/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 61/100 against 5/100
Cityradar
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | Cityradar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | CityRadar turns official city open data into evidence-backed signals about new and changing local businesses for B2B service providers. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | Data Analytics, Business Intelligence, Local Business Data, Open Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | Cityradar |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series D | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | Cityradar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 10/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | Cityradar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs Cityradar: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or Cityradar?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and Cityradar compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 41/100), domain rating (61/100 against 5/100).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the Cityradar review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.