At-Bay vs AXA XL
At-Bay vs AXA XL, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: At-Bay is on 70/100 and AXA XL on 28/100.
Where each one leads
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 28/100
AXA XL
- domain rating: 74/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 10,726 against 359
- funding raised: $3.8B against $292M
- LinkedIn following: 252,972 against 20,419
At a glance
| Measure | At-Bay | AXA XL |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. | Global P&C and specialty risk division of AXA, providing insurance and reinsurance solutions. |
| Category | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance | Insurance, Re-Insurance, Specialty Insurance, Commercial Lines Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Insurance |
| Founded | 2016 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Stamford, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | At-Bay | AXA XL |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 359 | 10,726 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $292M | $3.8B |
| Latest round | Series D | Grant (prize money) |
| Valuation | $1.4B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,419 | 252,972 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | At-Bay | AXA XL |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 28/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 15/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | At-Bay | AXA XL |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Azure |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
At-Bay vs AXA XL: common questions
Which is better, At-Bay or AXA XL?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 28/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do At-Bay and AXA XL compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 28/100). AXA XL leads on domain rating (74/100 against 61/100), headcount (10,726 against 359), funding raised ($3.8B against $292M), LinkedIn following (252,972 against 20,419).
Read the full At-Bay review and pricing or the AXA XL review and pricing. You can also browse other At-Bay alternatives we track.