AstroTeq.ai vs Umbra
AstroTeq.ai vs Umbra, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AstroTeq.ai is on 47/100 and Umbra on 54/100.
Where each one leads
AstroTeq.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Umbra
- our overall score: 54/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 193 against 5
- funding raised: $168M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | Umbra |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leveraging AI and satellite data to predict earthquakes and mitigate seismic risks. | SAR satellite company delivering the most capable synthetic aperture radar data on the market. |
| Category | Space, Climate Tech, SpaceTech, AI-Driven Grid Balancing | Space, SAR Satellites, Earth Observation, Defense |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Software | Not published |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Santa Barbara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | Umbra |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 193 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $168M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,102 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | Umbra |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | Umbra |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
AstroTeq.ai vs Umbra: common questions
Which is better, AstroTeq.ai or Umbra?
On our 0-100 score Umbra rates higher (54/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AstroTeq.ai and Umbra compare on the numbers?
Umbra leads on our overall score (54/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 34/100), domain rating (58/100 against 22/100), headcount (193 against 5), funding raised ($168M against $1.0M).
Read the full AstroTeq.ai review and pricing or the Umbra review and pricing. You can also browse other AstroTeq.ai alternatives we track.