AstroTeq.ai vs ICEYE
AstroTeq.ai vs ICEYE, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AstroTeq.ai is on 47/100 and ICEYE on 60/100.
Where each one leads
AstroTeq.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
ICEYE
- our overall score: 60/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $750M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | ICEYE |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Leveraging AI and satellite data to predict earthquakes and mitigate seismic risks. | Global leader in synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) satellite data and analytics for near real-time insights. |
| Category | Space, Climate Tech, SpaceTech, AI-Driven Grid Balancing | SpaceTech, Satellite, Earth Observation, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Espoo, Finland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | ICEYE |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -6.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $750M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series F |
| Valuation | Not published | $10B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,102 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | ICEYE |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AstroTeq.ai | ICEYE |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Matomo, Reddit Pixel |
AstroTeq.ai vs ICEYE: common questions
Which is better, AstroTeq.ai or ICEYE?
On our 0-100 score ICEYE rates higher (60/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AstroTeq.ai and ICEYE compare on the numbers?
ICEYE leads on our overall score (60/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 34/100), domain rating (70/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($750M against $1.0M).
Read the full AstroTeq.ai review and pricing or the ICEYE review and pricing. You can also browse other AstroTeq.ai alternatives we track.