Astranis vs Hughes Communications
Astranis vs Hughes Communications, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Astranis is on 59/100 and Hughes Communications on Not scored yet.
Where each one leads
Astranis
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Hughes Communications
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 3,225 against 497
At a glance
| Measure | Astranis | Hughes Communications |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | MicroGEO satellite company providing dedicated broadband connectivity from geostationary orbit. | Hughes Communications was a provider of satellite-based communication services, now a subsidiary of EchoStar. |
| Category | Space, Satellites, Telecommunications, Broadband | Satellite Communications, Telecommunications, Internet Service Provider, Managed Network Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | Not published | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Not published | Software | services |
| Founded | 2015 | 1971 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Germantown, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Astranis | Hughes Communications |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 497 | 3,225 |
| Total funding | $450M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 69,200 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Astranis | Hughes Communications |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | Not published |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 10/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Astranis | Hughes Communications |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Astranis vs Hughes Communications: common questions
Which is better, Astranis or Hughes Communications?
On our 0-100 score Astranis rates higher (59/100 against Not scored yet). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Astranis and Hughes Communications compare on the numbers?
Hughes Communications leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100), domain rating (72/100 against 57/100), headcount (3,225 against 497).
Read the full Astranis review and pricing or the Hughes Communications review and pricing. You can also browse other Astranis alternatives we track.