ASICS Runkeeper vs WHOOP
ASICS Runkeeper vs WHOOP, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ASICS Runkeeper is on 54/100 and WHOOP on 67/100.
Where each one leads
ASICS Runkeeper
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 25/100
WHOOP
- our overall score: 67/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $575M against $11.5M
At a glance
| Measure | ASICS Runkeeper | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A GPS fitness tracking app for iOS and Android, now part of ASICS. | WHOOP is a wearable coach providing 24/7 health insights to help improve health, fitness, and longevity. |
| Category | Fitness Technology, Mobile Apps, SaaS, Digital Health | Wearables, HealthTech, Fitness Technology, Consumer Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Not published |
| Founded | 2008 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ASICS Runkeeper | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,228 |
| Total funding | $11.5M | $575M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $10B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 188,354 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ASICS Runkeeper | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 41/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ASICS Runkeeper | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | ASICS Runkeeper | WHOOP |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | 24/7 Health Monitoring, Personalized Coaching, Medical-Grade Insights, Healthspan Tracking, Customizable Design, Irregular Heart Rhythm Notifications |
ASICS Runkeeper vs WHOOP: common questions
Which is better, ASICS Runkeeper or WHOOP?
On our 0-100 score WHOOP rates higher (67/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ASICS Runkeeper and WHOOP compare on the numbers?
ASICS Runkeeper leads on agent readiness (30/100 against 25/100). WHOOP leads on our overall score (67/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($575M against $11.5M).
Read the full ASICS Runkeeper review and pricing or the WHOOP review and pricing. You can also browse other ASICS Runkeeper alternatives we track.