ASAAS vs Pagaya Investments
ASAAS vs Pagaya Investments, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ASAAS is on 70/100 and Pagaya Investments on 65/100.
Where each one leads
ASAAS
- our overall score: 70/100 against 65/100
- domain rating: 81/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 1,349 against 463
- LinkedIn following: 144,794 against 70,861
Pagaya Investments
- funding raised: $1.4B against $102M
At a glance
| Measure | ASAAS | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ASAAS automates financial processes and enhances customer relationships for businesses. | AI-powered network enabling financial institutions to expand customer access and scale lending. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Embedded Finance, Lending | Fintech, Asset Management, Fixed Income, Credit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ASAAS | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,349 | 463 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -14.3% |
| Total funding | $102M | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Series C | Credit Facility |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.3B |
| LinkedIn followers | 144,794 | 70,861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ASAAS | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 93/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ASAAS | Pagaya Investments |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
ASAAS vs Pagaya Investments: common questions
Which is better, ASAAS or Pagaya Investments?
On our 0-100 score ASAAS rates higher (70/100 against 65/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ASAAS and Pagaya Investments compare on the numbers?
ASAAS leads on our overall score (70/100 against 65/100), domain rating (81/100 against 59/100), headcount (1,349 against 463), LinkedIn following (144,794 against 70,861). Pagaya Investments leads on funding raised ($1.4B against $102M).
Read the full ASAAS review and pricing or the Pagaya Investments review and pricing. You can also browse other ASAAS alternatives we track.