Arzeda vs Atomic-AI
Arzeda vs Atomic-AI, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arzeda is on 61/100 and Atomic-AI on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Arzeda
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 33/100
- headcount: 74 against 30
- LinkedIn following: 8,740 against 5,286
Atomic-AI
- funding raised: $6.2B against $60.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Arzeda | Atomic-AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Computational protein design company creating novel enzymes and proteins using AI and physics-based modeling. | AI platform for drug discovery and development, accelerating research with advanced computational tools. |
| Category | Biotech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Computational Biology, Enzyme Engineering | Biotech, Drug Discovery, AI-Driven Protein Design, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2008 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arzeda | Atomic-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 74 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | Not published | 1 |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $6.2B |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,740 | 5,286 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arzeda | Atomic-AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arzeda | Atomic-AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Ghost | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Angular | Jquery |
Arzeda vs Atomic-AI: common questions
Which is better, Arzeda or Atomic-AI?
On our 0-100 score Arzeda rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arzeda and Atomic-AI compare on the numbers?
Arzeda leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (64/100 against 33/100), domain rating (39/100 against 33/100), headcount (74 against 30), LinkedIn following (8,740 against 5,286). Atomic-AI leads on funding raised ($6.2B against $60.0M).
Read the full Arzeda review and pricing or the Atomic-AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Arzeda alternatives we track.