Arteris IP vs SiFive
Arteris IP vs SiFive, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arteris IP is on 52/100 and SiFive on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Arteris IP
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SiFive
- our overall score: 66/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 58/100
- funding raised: $775M against $9.7M
- LinkedIn following: 64,744 against 24,388
At a glance
| Measure | Arteris IP | SiFive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provider of system IP and SoC integration automation and security for semiconductor development. | Designs and licenses RISC-V based custom processor cores and IP for diverse applications. |
| Category | Semiconductors, Semiconductor Intellectual Property (IP), Electronic Design Automation (EDA), System IP | AI Chip, AI Hardware, Chip Design, Semiconductor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Campbell, United States | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arteris IP | SiFive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 457 | 505 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +43.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $9.7M | $775M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series G |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,388 | 64,744 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arteris IP | SiFive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arteris IP | SiFive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Heroku |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Arteris IP vs SiFive: common questions
Which is better, Arteris IP or SiFive?
On our 0-100 score SiFive rates higher (66/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arteris IP and SiFive compare on the numbers?
SiFive leads on our overall score (66/100 against 52/100), domain rating (70/100 against 58/100), funding raised ($775M against $9.7M), LinkedIn following (64,744 against 24,388).
Read the full Arteris IP review and pricing or the SiFive review and pricing. You can also browse other Arteris IP alternatives we track.