Artemis Analytics vs StarkWare
Artemis Analytics vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Artemis Analytics is on 11/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Artemis Analytics
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 30/100
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 11/100
- headcount: 194 against 27
At a glance
| Measure | Artemis Analytics | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Institutional crypto analytics platform aggregating metrics across 12,000+ tokens and 50+ blockchains | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Cryptocurrency, Data Analytics, Fintech, Blockchain Analytics | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | SaaS | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Artemis Analytics | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 27 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $180M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Artemis Analytics | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 11/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 14/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Artemis Analytics | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Artemis Analytics vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Artemis Analytics or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Artemis Analytics and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
Artemis Analytics leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 30/100). StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 11/100), headcount (194 against 27).
Read the full Artemis Analytics review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Artemis Analytics alternatives we track.