Ars Technica vs Wired
Ars Technica vs Wired, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ars Technica is on 25/100 and Wired on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Ars Technica
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Wired
- our overall score: 48/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 568 against 177
- LinkedIn following: 1,743,771 against 56,048
At a glance
| Measure | Ars Technica | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | In-depth technology news, reviews, and analysis for tech enthusiasts and professionals. | A magazine and digital platform covering technology, culture, and politics. |
| Category | Online Audio and Video Media, Technology News, Tech Analysis, Consumer Electronics | Media, Culture, Politics, Business |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Services |
| Founded | 1998 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | New York, US | San Francisco, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ars Technica | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 177 | 568 |
| Total funding | Not published | $21.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 56,048 | 1,743,771 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ars Technica | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ars Technica | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Ars Technica | Wired |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“MacBook Neo hands-on: Apple build quality at a substantially lower price - ArsTechnica. The Neo won’t be for everyone, but Apple has managed to preserve a premium feel.”r/apple
Ars Technica vs Wired: common questions
Which is better, Ars Technica or Wired?
On our 0-100 score Wired rates higher (48/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ars Technica and Wired compare on the numbers?
Wired leads on our overall score (48/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (40/100 against 21/100), headcount (568 against 177), LinkedIn following (1,743,771 against 56,048).
What do real users say about Ars Technica and Wired?
Ars Technica: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/apple.
Read the full Ars Technica review and pricing or the Wired review and pricing. You can also browse other Ars Technica alternatives we track.