Arq vs Cisco
Arq vs Cisco, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arq is on 43/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
Arq
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 6/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 9
- funding raised: $220B against $1.4M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 946
At a glance
| Measure | Arq | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | UK quantum technology startup developing networking hardware for the quantum internet. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Quantum Technology, Telecommunications, Networking, Hardware | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2025 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Barcelona, United Kingdom | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arq | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 9 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $1.4M | $220B |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | 946 | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arq | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 41/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (29/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 6/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arq | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Support stack | Not detected | Khoros |
Arq vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, Arq or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arq and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 29/100), domain rating (91/100 against 6/100), headcount (95,924 against 9), funding raised ($220B against $1.4M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 946).
Read the full Arq review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other Arq alternatives we track.