Arpio vs CloudEndure
Arpio vs CloudEndure, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arpio is on 52/100 and CloudEndure on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Arpio
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 35 against 3
CloudEndure
- our overall score: 56/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 59/100 against 53/100
- funding raised: $25.2M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 9,696 against 1,792
At a glance
| Measure | Arpio | CloudEndure |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Recovery & resilience platform for cloud environments. | CloudEndure provides disaster recovery, continuous backup, and live migration solutions for hybrid cloud environments. |
| Category | Cloud Security, Cybersecurity, Disaster Recovery, Business Continuity | Enterprise, Information Technology (IT), Disaster Recovery, Cloud Migration |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Durham, USA | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arpio | CloudEndure |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -38.3% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $25.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,792 | 9,696 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arpio | CloudEndure |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arpio | CloudEndure |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Arpio | CloudEndure |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads |
“Curious if cloudendure users are still seeing issues with replication after the outage from today. Getting into the console is 50/50 and replication status once inside is a mess.”r/aws
Arpio vs CloudEndure: common questions
Which is better, Arpio or CloudEndure?
On our 0-100 score CloudEndure rates higher (56/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arpio and CloudEndure compare on the numbers?
Arpio leads on agent readiness (30/100 against 22/100), headcount (35 against 3). CloudEndure leads on our overall score (56/100 against 52/100), domain rating (59/100 against 53/100), funding raised ($25.2M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (9,696 against 1,792).
What do real users say about Arpio and CloudEndure?
CloudEndure: 0 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/aws.
Read the full Arpio review and pricing or the CloudEndure review and pricing. You can also browse other Arpio alternatives we track.