Arpeely vs Peer39
Arpeely vs Peer39, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arpeely is on 41/100 and Peer39 on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Arpeely
- headcount: 82 against 61
- LinkedIn following: 10,810 against 4,855
Peer39
- our overall score: 48/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 60/100 against 45/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +33.2%
At a glance
| Measure | Arpeely | Peer39 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Machine learning-based media acquisition algorithms for real-time bidding environments. | Develops semantic advertising technology for precise ad-to-content matching using NLP and ML. |
| Category | Marketing, Real-Time Bidding, DSP, AdTech | Marketing, Real-Time Bidding, AdTech, MarTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arpeely | Peer39 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 82 | 61 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +33.2% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $20.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,810 | 4,855 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arpeely | Peer39 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arpeely | Peer39 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Tiktok Pixel, Reddit Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Arpeely vs Peer39: common questions
Which is better, Arpeely or Peer39?
On our 0-100 score Peer39 rates higher (48/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arpeely and Peer39 compare on the numbers?
Arpeely leads on headcount (82 against 61), LinkedIn following (10,810 against 4,855). Peer39 leads on our overall score (48/100 against 41/100), domain rating (60/100 against 45/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against +33.2%).
Read the full Arpeely review and pricing or the Peer39 review and pricing. You can also browse other Arpeely alternatives we track.