Arpeely vs Cignal.io
Arpeely vs Cignal.io, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arpeely is on 41/100 and Cignal.io on 15/100.
Where each one leads
Arpeely
- our overall score: 41/100 against 15/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 82 against 26
Cignal.io
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Arpeely | Cignal.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Machine learning-based media acquisition algorithms for real-time bidding environments. | Machine-learning ad-tech platform that optimizes ad bidstreams for DSPs. |
| Category | Marketing, Real-Time Bidding, DSP, AdTech | Marketing, Programmatic Media, Real-Time Bidding, DSP |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arpeely | Cignal.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 82 | 26 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +33.2% | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,810 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arpeely | Cignal.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 15/100 |
| Traction | 19/100 | 14/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 14/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (20/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 45/100 | 30/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arpeely | Cignal.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Segment |
Arpeely vs Cignal.io: common questions
Which is better, Arpeely or Cignal.io?
On our 0-100 score Arpeely rates higher (41/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arpeely and Cignal.io compare on the numbers?
Arpeely leads on our overall score (41/100 against 15/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 20/100), domain rating (45/100 against 30/100), headcount (82 against 26).
Read the full Arpeely review and pricing or the Cignal.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Arpeely alternatives we track.