Arnica vs JFrog
Arnica vs JFrog, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arnica is on 49/100 and JFrog on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Arnica
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
JFrog
- our overall score: 64/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 2,427 against 60
- funding raised: $220M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 100,512 against 8,027
At a glance
| Measure | Arnica | JFrog |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Arnica provides DevSecOps solutions to protect against software supply chain attacks. | JFrog provides a DevOps platform for building, managing, and distributing software from developer to device. |
| Category | Enterprise, DevSecOps, CI/CD, Supply Chain | DevOps, Enterprise, Development, Software Supply Chain |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Sunnyvale, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arnica | JFrog |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 60 | 2,427 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +15.7% | +18.6% |
| Total funding | $7.0M | $220M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,027 | 100,512 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arnica | JFrog |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arnica | JFrog |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Arnica | JFrog |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“I am/was a proponent of jfrog artifactory for small to middle (50 people) companies i contracted for. To install the self-hosted version for the following reasons: As a cache for artifacts (docker, maven, rpm, others) to put less stress on ”r/devops
Arnica vs JFrog: common questions
Which is better, Arnica or JFrog?
On our 0-100 score JFrog rates higher (64/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arnica and JFrog compare on the numbers?
JFrog leads on our overall score (64/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 47/100), domain rating (83/100 against 56/100), headcount (2,427 against 60), funding raised ($220M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (100,512 against 8,027).
What do real users say about Arnica and JFrog?
JFrog: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Arnica review and pricing or the JFrog review and pricing. You can also browse other Arnica alternatives we track.