ARMO vs Portshift
ARMO vs Portshift, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ARMO is on 56/100 and Portshift on 55/100.
Where each one leads
ARMO
- headcount: 39 against 6
- funding raised: $34.5M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 4,877 against 1,438
Portshift
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ARMO | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ARMO provides an open-source Kubernetes security platform, Kubescape, for end-to-end security from development to production. | Cloud-native security and compliance platform for DevOps teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Open Source, Kubernetes, Cybersecurity | DevOps, Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Kubernetes |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ARMO | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 6 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $34.5M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,877 | 1,438 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ARMO | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ARMO | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ARMO vs Portshift: common questions
Which is better, ARMO or Portshift?
On our 0-100 score ARMO rates higher (56/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ARMO and Portshift compare on the numbers?
ARMO leads on headcount (39 against 6), funding raised ($34.5M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (4,877 against 1,438).
Read the full ARMO review and pricing or the Portshift review and pricing. You can also browse other ARMO alternatives we track.