ARMO vs Imperva
ARMO vs Imperva, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ARMO is on 56/100 and Imperva on 67/100.
Where each one leads
ARMO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 39
- funding raised: $75.7M against $34.5M
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 4,877
At a glance
| Measure | ARMO | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ARMO provides an open-source Kubernetes security platform, Kubescape, for end-to-end security from development to production. | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. |
| Category | Enterprise, Open Source, Kubernetes, Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ARMO | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 1,700 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $34.5M | $75.7M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $10.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,877 | 75,709 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ARMO | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ARMO | Imperva |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ARMO vs Imperva: common questions
Which is better, ARMO or Imperva?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ARMO and Imperva compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100), domain rating (84/100 against 60/100), headcount (1,700 against 39), funding raised ($75.7M against $34.5M), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 4,877).
Read the full ARMO review and pricing or the Imperva review and pricing. You can also browse other ARMO alternatives we track.