ARMO vs Dazz
ARMO vs Dazz, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ARMO is on 56/100 and Dazz on 69/100.
Where each one leads
ARMO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Dazz
- our overall score: 69/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 52 against 39
- headcount growth: +13.7% against -30.9%
- funding raised: $125M against $34.5M
- LinkedIn following: 16,482 against 4,877
At a glance
| Measure | ARMO | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ARMO provides an open-source Kubernetes security platform, Kubescape, for end-to-end security from development to production. | Automated remediation for security and development teams, fixing code flaws with one-click fixes. |
| Category | Enterprise, Open Source, Kubernetes, Cybersecurity | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Development, Vulnerability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ARMO | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 52 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.9% | +13.7% |
| Total funding | $34.5M | $125M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $380M |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,877 | 16,482 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ARMO | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ARMO | Dazz |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ARMO vs Dazz: common questions
Which is better, ARMO or Dazz?
On our 0-100 score Dazz rates higher (69/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ARMO and Dazz compare on the numbers?
Dazz leads on our overall score (69/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 21/100), domain rating (84/100 against 60/100), headcount (52 against 39), headcount growth (+13.7% against -30.9%), funding raised ($125M against $34.5M), LinkedIn following (16,482 against 4,877).
Read the full ARMO review and pricing or the Dazz review and pricing. You can also browse other ARMO alternatives we track.