ARMO vs Cisco
ARMO vs Cisco, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ARMO is on 56/100 and Cisco on 83/100.
Where each one leads
ARMO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Cisco
- our overall score: 83/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 95,924 against 39
- headcount growth: +4.2% against -30.9%
- funding raised: $220B against $34.5M
- LinkedIn following: 7,660,767 against 4,877
At a glance
| Measure | ARMO | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ARMO provides an open-source Kubernetes security platform, Kubescape, for end-to-end security from development to production. | Technology infrastructure and networking company providing enterprise solutions |
| Category | Enterprise, Open Source, Kubernetes, Cybersecurity | Internet of Things (IoT), Video Conferencing, Networking Hardware, Cybersecurity |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B Hardware / SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ARMO | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 95,924 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.9% | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $34.5M | $220B |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $240B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,877 | 7,660,767 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ARMO | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 83/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 67/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ARMO | Cisco |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
ARMO vs Cisco: common questions
Which is better, ARMO or Cisco?
On our 0-100 score Cisco rates higher (83/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ARMO and Cisco compare on the numbers?
Cisco leads on our overall score (83/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 21/100), domain rating (91/100 against 60/100), headcount (95,924 against 39), headcount growth (+4.2% against -30.9%), funding raised ($220B against $34.5M), LinkedIn following (7,660,767 against 4,877).
Read the full ARMO review and pricing or the Cisco review and pricing. You can also browse other ARMO alternatives we track.