Armis Security vs Phish.ai
Armis Security vs Phish.ai, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Armis Security is on 73/100 and Phish.ai on 19/100.
Where each one leads
Armis Security
- our overall score: 73/100 against 19/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 8/100
- headcount: 1,291 against 2
Phish.ai
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Armis Security | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agentless cybersecurity platform providing asset intelligence and security for all connected devices. | Real-time, zero-day phishing prevention using cloud-native AI and computer vision. |
| Category | Enterprise, IoT, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Carlos, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Armis Security | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,291 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +24.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $847M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series G | Not published |
| Valuation | $4.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 69,052 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Armis Security | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 73/100 | 19/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 42/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Armis Security | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Armis Security | Phish.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“Harnessing the power of Phish.AI, PhishTank, Google Big Query and Google Data Studio to analyze Phishing Trends.”r/bigquery
Armis Security vs Phish.ai: common questions
Which is better, Armis Security or Phish.ai?
On our 0-100 score Armis Security rates higher (73/100 against 19/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Armis Security and Phish.ai compare on the numbers?
Armis Security leads on our overall score (73/100 against 19/100), domain rating (76/100 against 8/100), headcount (1,291 against 2). Phish.ai leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 25/100).
What do real users say about Armis Security and Phish.ai?
Phish.ai: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/bigquery.
Read the full Armis Security review and pricing or the Phish.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Armis Security alternatives we track.