ARMILLA vs At-Bay
ARMILLA vs At-Bay, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ARMILLA is on 16/100 and At-Bay on 70/100.
Where each one leads
ARMILLA
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At-Bay
- our overall score: 70/100 against 16/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | ARMILLA | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-powered insurance platform for generative AI and AI agents. | At-Bay is a cyber insurance and security company that combines insurance products with active security monitoring to help businesses prevent and recover from cyber threats. |
| Category | InsurTech, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Generative AI, Agent Liability Insurance | InsurTech, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Parametric Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ARMILLA | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 359 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +18.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $292M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,419 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ARMILLA | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 16/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 61/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ARMILLA | At-Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Hotjar +1 more |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
ARMILLA vs At-Bay: common questions
Which is better, ARMILLA or At-Bay?
On our 0-100 score At-Bay rates higher (70/100 against 16/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ARMILLA and At-Bay compare on the numbers?
At-Bay leads on our overall score (70/100 against 16/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 37/100).
Read the full ARMILLA review and pricing or the At-Bay review and pricing. You can also browse other ARMILLA alternatives we track.