Arkeon Technologies vs QBLOX
Arkeon Technologies vs QBLOX, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arkeon Technologies is on 35/100 and QBLOX on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Arkeon Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QBLOX
- our overall score: 61/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $26.0M against $594K
At a glance
| Measure | Arkeon Technologies | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Improving precision and quality in the production of superconducting quantum chips. | Qblox provides modular hardware and software solutions for scalable quantum computer control. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Semiconductors, Deep Tech, Semiconductor | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Control Systems, Quantum Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2025 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Gothenburg, Sweden | Delft, Netherlands |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arkeon Technologies | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 183 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.7% |
| Total funding | $594K | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 15,366 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arkeon Technologies | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 29/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 24/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 75/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arkeon Technologies | QBLOX |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Arkeon Technologies vs QBLOX: common questions
Which is better, Arkeon Technologies or QBLOX?
On our 0-100 score QBLOX rates higher (61/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arkeon Technologies and QBLOX compare on the numbers?
QBLOX leads on our overall score (61/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($26.0M against $594K).
Read the full Arkeon Technologies review and pricing or the QBLOX review and pricing. You can also browse other Arkeon Technologies alternatives we track.