ArcusTeam vs SafeBreach
ArcusTeam vs SafeBreach, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ArcusTeam is on 44/100 and SafeBreach on 61/100.
Where each one leads
ArcusTeam
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SafeBreach
- our overall score: 61/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 141 against 12
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -11.3%
- funding raised: $141M against $2.0M
- LinkedIn following: 23,010 against 2,590
At a glance
| Measure | ArcusTeam | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | DeviceTotal provides an AI-powered, agentless platform for detecting and eliminating vulnerabilities in OT, IoT, and network devices. | SafeBreach offers a continuous security validation platform that simulates breach and attack scenarios to identify security gaps. |
| Category | Enterprise, IoT, Cybersecurity, IoT Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Breach and Attack Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ArcusTeam | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 12 | 141 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -11.3% | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $2.0M | $141M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series D Extension |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,590 | 23,010 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ArcusTeam | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 43/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ArcusTeam | SafeBreach |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
ArcusTeam vs SafeBreach: common questions
Which is better, ArcusTeam or SafeBreach?
On our 0-100 score SafeBreach rates higher (61/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ArcusTeam and SafeBreach compare on the numbers?
SafeBreach leads on our overall score (61/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (53/100 against 44/100), domain rating (71/100 against 30/100), headcount (141 against 12), headcount growth (+500.0% against -11.3%), funding raised ($141M against $2.0M), LinkedIn following (23,010 against 2,590).
Read the full ArcusTeam review and pricing or the SafeBreach review and pricing. You can also browse other ArcusTeam alternatives we track.