Arcube vs Wakanow
Arcube vs Wakanow, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arcube is on 42/100 and Wakanow on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Arcube
- domain rating: 11/100 against 2/100
Wakanow
- our overall score: 63/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 45/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $1.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Arcube | Wakanow |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Ancillary aggregation technology connecting airlines to hundreds of global suppliers. | A full-service online travel company providing a one-stop booking portal for flights, hotels, and travel services. |
| Category | Travel Tech, Airline Technology, Ancillary Revenue, B2B SaaS | Travel Tech, Online Travel Agency, Flight Booking, Hotel Booking |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tunis, Tunisia | Atlanta, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arcube | Wakanow |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 801 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -6.5% |
| Total funding | $1.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 25,716 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arcube | Wakanow |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 19/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | C (64/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 11/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arcube | Wakanow |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Angular, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Arcube vs Wakanow: common questions
Which is better, Arcube or Wakanow?
On our 0-100 score Wakanow rates higher (63/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arcube and Wakanow compare on the numbers?
Arcube leads on domain rating (11/100 against 2/100). Wakanow leads on our overall score (63/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (64/100 against 45/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $1.0M).
Read the full Arcube review and pricing or the Wakanow review and pricing. You can also browse other Arcube alternatives we track.