Arctic Wolf vs LogRhythm
Arctic Wolf vs LogRhythm, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arctic Wolf is on 67/100 and LogRhythm on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Arctic Wolf
- our overall score: 67/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 3,314 against 800
- LinkedIn following: 142,739 against 50,434
LogRhythm
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | LogRhythm |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native cybersecurity company providing managed detection and response (MDR) services. | LogRhythm provides a comprehensive SIEM platform for detecting, responding to, and neutralizing cyber threats. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM), Log Management, Network Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Plano, United States | Boulder, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | LogRhythm |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,314 | 800 |
| Total funding | Not published | $90.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series F |
| Valuation | $4.2B | $248M |
| LinkedIn followers | 142,739 | 50,434 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | LogRhythm |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 17/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | LogRhythm |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Matomo |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Arctic Wolf vs LogRhythm: common questions
Which is better, Arctic Wolf or LogRhythm?
On our 0-100 score Arctic Wolf rates higher (67/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arctic Wolf and LogRhythm compare on the numbers?
Arctic Wolf leads on our overall score (67/100 against 62/100), headcount (3,314 against 800), LinkedIn following (142,739 against 50,434).
Read the full Arctic Wolf review and pricing or the LogRhythm review and pricing. You can also browse other Arctic Wolf alternatives we track.