Arctic Wolf vs CYREBRO
Arctic Wolf vs CYREBRO, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arctic Wolf is on 67/100 and CYREBRO on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Arctic Wolf
- our overall score: 67/100 against 61/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 37/100
- domain rating: 79/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 3,314 against 143
- LinkedIn following: 142,739 against 10,583
CYREBRO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-native cybersecurity company providing managed detection and response (MDR) services. | CYREBRO provides a managed detection and response (MDR) solution, offering a full-fledged Security Operations Center (SOC) to organizations. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Managed Detection and Response |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Plano, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,314 | 143 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.9% |
| Total funding | Not published | $66.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | $4.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 142,739 | 10,583 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 17/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (37/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arctic Wolf | CYREBRO |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Arctic Wolf vs CYREBRO: common questions
Which is better, Arctic Wolf or CYREBRO?
On our 0-100 score Arctic Wolf rates higher (67/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arctic Wolf and CYREBRO compare on the numbers?
Arctic Wolf leads on our overall score (67/100 against 61/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 37/100), domain rating (79/100 against 50/100), headcount (3,314 against 143), LinkedIn following (142,739 against 10,583).
Read the full Arctic Wolf review and pricing or the CYREBRO review and pricing. You can also browse other Arctic Wolf alternatives we track.