Arcee vs Silurian
Arcee vs Silurian, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arcee is on 44/100 and Silurian on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Arcee
- domain rating: 71/100 against 25/100
- headcount: 39 against 13
- LinkedIn following: 11,713 against 2,842
Silurian
- our overall score: 54/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 36/100
At a glance
| Measure | Arcee | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Arcee provides U.S.-made, open source large language models and checkpoints for insight into raw model intelligence. | Foundation models for simulating Earth's systems, starting with weather. |
| Category | Foundation Model, Large Language Model, Open Source, AI Infrastructure | Foundation Model, AI-driven Weather Forecasting, Earth System Simulation, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Kirkland, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arcee | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 13 |
| Total funding | Not published | $11.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,713 | 2,842 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arcee | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 47/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 25/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arcee | Silurian |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Arcee vs Silurian: common questions
Which is better, Arcee or Silurian?
On our 0-100 score Silurian rates higher (54/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arcee and Silurian compare on the numbers?
Arcee leads on domain rating (71/100 against 25/100), headcount (39 against 13), LinkedIn following (11,713 against 2,842). Silurian leads on our overall score (54/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 36/100).
Read the full Arcee review and pricing or the Silurian review and pricing. You can also browse other Arcee alternatives we track.