Arcee vs H2O.ai
Arcee vs H2O.ai, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Arcee is on 44/100 and H2O.ai on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Arcee
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
H2O.ai
- our overall score: 64/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 352 against 39
- LinkedIn following: 155,295 against 11,713
At a glance
| Measure | Arcee | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Arcee provides U.S.-made, open source large language models and checkpoints for insight into raw model intelligence. | An open-source AI and machine learning platform for enterprises. |
| Category | Foundation Model, Large Language Model, Open Source, AI Infrastructure | Foundation Model, Generative AI, Large Language Model, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Arcee | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 352 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +5.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $228M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,713 | 155,295 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Arcee | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 16/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 77/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Arcee | H2O.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Arcee vs H2O.ai: common questions
Which is better, Arcee or H2O.ai?
On our 0-100 score H2O.ai rates higher (64/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Arcee and H2O.ai compare on the numbers?
H2O.ai leads on our overall score (64/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 36/100), headcount (352 against 39), LinkedIn following (155,295 against 11,713).
Read the full Arcee review and pricing or the H2O.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Arcee alternatives we track.