Aquatis vs Kando
Aquatis vs Kando, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aquatis is on 25/100 and Kando on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Aquatis
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +36.3% against -15.1%
Kando
- our overall score: 62/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 19/100
- headcount: 50 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 6,902 against 456
At a glance
| Measure | Aquatis | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Predictive and prescriptive maintenance solutions for the water industry. | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. |
| Category | Water, Predictive Maintenance, Industrial, Water Treatment | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2023 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aquatis | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.3% | -15.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $36.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 456 | 6,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aquatis | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aquatis | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Aquatis vs Kando: common questions
Which is better, Aquatis or Kando?
On our 0-100 score Kando rates higher (62/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aquatis and Kando compare on the numbers?
Aquatis leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+36.3% against -15.1%). Kando leads on our overall score (62/100 against 25/100), domain rating (31/100 against 19/100), headcount (50 against 2), LinkedIn following (6,902 against 456).
Read the full Aquatis review and pricing or the Kando review and pricing. You can also browse other Aquatis alternatives we track.