Aquantia vs Mellanox Technologies
Aquantia vs Mellanox Technologies, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aquantia is on 54/100 and Mellanox Technologies on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Aquantia
- headcount: 11,250 against 843
- LinkedIn following: 457,322 against 51,782
Mellanox Technologies
- our overall score: 75/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 76/100
- funding raised: $100M against $70.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Aquantia | Mellanox Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | High-speed Ethernet solutions for data centers and enterprise networks. | High-performance InfiniBand and Ethernet interconnect solutions for data centers. |
| Category | Semiconductor, Networking Hardware, Data Center Infrastructure, Enterprise Networking | Semiconductor, Communication, Data Center, Networking Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2004 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Fremont, United States | Yokneam, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aquantia | Mellanox Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11,250 | 843 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -5.4% |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series C | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 457,322 | 51,782 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aquantia | Mellanox Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 90/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aquantia | Mellanox Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
Aquantia vs Mellanox Technologies: common questions
Which is better, Aquantia or Mellanox Technologies?
On our 0-100 score Mellanox Technologies rates higher (75/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aquantia and Mellanox Technologies compare on the numbers?
Aquantia leads on headcount (11,250 against 843), LinkedIn following (457,322 against 51,782). Mellanox Technologies leads on our overall score (75/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 25/100), domain rating (91/100 against 76/100), funding raised ($100M against $70.0M).
Read the full Aquantia review and pricing or the Mellanox Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other Aquantia alternatives we track.