AQUALITAS vs SupPlant
AQUALITAS vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: AQUALITAS is on 23/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
AQUALITAS
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 23/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 55 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 15,340 against 532
At a glance
| Measure | AQUALITAS | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered water quality monitoring for operational decision-making, leveraging deep understanding of water chemistry and sensory principles. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | Water, Monitoring, Wastewater, Agritech | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | AQUALITAS | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $52.9M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 532 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | AQUALITAS | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 23/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | AQUALITAS | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
AQUALITAS vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, AQUALITAS or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do AQUALITAS and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 23/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 22/100), domain rating (38/100 against 1/100), headcount (55 against 2), LinkedIn following (15,340 against 532).
Read the full AQUALITAS review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other AQUALITAS alternatives we track.