Aqua vs Performativ
Aqua vs Performativ, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua is on 7/100 and Performativ on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua
- agent readiness: 24/100 against 21/100
Performativ
- our overall score: 58/100 against 7/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 27/100
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua | Performativ |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An AI-native platform for alternative investments, empowering advisors and fund managers. | Next-generation operating system for wealth management. |
| Category | Fintech, Alternative Investments, Wealth Management, AI-driven Platform | Fintech, Wealth Management, Asset Management, WealthTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York City, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua | Performativ |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 44 |
| Total funding | Not published | $20.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 4,202 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua | Performativ |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 4/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (24/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua | Performativ |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Replit | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Aqua vs Performativ: common questions
Which is better, Aqua or Performativ?
On our 0-100 score Performativ rates higher (58/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua and Performativ compare on the numbers?
Aqua leads on agent readiness (24/100 against 21/100). Performativ leads on our overall score (58/100 against 7/100), domain rating (36/100 against 27/100).
Read the full Aqua review and pricing or the Performativ review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua alternatives we track.