Aqua Membranes, . vs Gradiant
Aqua Membranes, . vs Gradiant, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Membranes, . is on 47/100 and Gradiant on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Membranes, .
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Gradiant
- our overall score: 61/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 859 against 37
- funding raised: $804M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 82,956 against 4,051
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Membranes, . | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Revolutionizing industrial reverse osmosis with 3D-printed spacer technology for enhanced flow, reduced energy, and higher water recovery. | End-to-end water and wastewater treatment solutions for critical industries. |
| Category | Water Treatment, Industrial Automation, Advanced Manufacturing, 3D Printing | Water Treatment, Wastewater Treatment, Industrial Water, Resource Recovery |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software | hardware | services | platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Diego, United States | Newton, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Membranes, . | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 859 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.2% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $804M |
| Latest round | Seed | E |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,051 | 82,956 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Membranes, . | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 36/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 88/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Membranes, . | Gradiant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Aqua Membranes, . vs Gradiant: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Membranes, . or Gradiant?
On our 0-100 score Gradiant rates higher (61/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Membranes, . and Gradiant compare on the numbers?
Gradiant leads on our overall score (61/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (55/100 against 29/100), headcount (859 against 37), funding raised ($804M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (82,956 against 4,051).
Read the full Aqua Membranes, . review and pricing or the Gradiant review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Membranes, . alternatives we track.