Applyfast vs Pitch
Applyfast vs Pitch, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applyfast is on 11/100 and Pitch on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Applyfast
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pitch
- our overall score: 62/100 against 11/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 51/100
At a glance
| Measure | Applyfast | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Create tailored job applications in under a minute by adapting your CV to job requirements. | Collaborative pitch deck and presentation software for modern teams. |
| Category | Career Services, Job Search Tools, Productivity Software, Document Generation | Presentation Software, Collaboration Tools, Productivity Software, Sales Enablement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applyfast | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 74 |
| Total funding | Not published | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 37,679 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applyfast | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 11/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applyfast | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Applyfast | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Hey! I built a job application tool called ApplyFast and I need some honest feedback from real people. Here’s what it does: ⚡ Upload your resume → AI reads it and fills your entire profile automatically 📝 Generate a tailored cover letter f”r/IMadeThis
Applyfast vs Pitch: common questions
Which is better, Applyfast or Pitch?
On our 0-100 score Pitch rates higher (62/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applyfast and Pitch compare on the numbers?
Pitch leads on our overall score (62/100 against 11/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 51/100).
What do real users say about Applyfast and Pitch?
Applyfast: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/IMadeThis.
Read the full Applyfast review and pricing or the Pitch review and pricing. You can also browse other Applyfast alternatives we track.