Applitools vs Checksum
Applitools vs Checksum, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applitools is on 62/100 and Checksum on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Applitools
- our overall score: 62/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 120 against 28
- LinkedIn following: 24,724 against 4,945
Checksum
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 42/100
- headcount growth: +88.7% against -0.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Applitools | Checksum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered visual testing and monitoring for web, mobile, and desktop applications. | AI-powered platform for automated end-to-end web application testing. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Software Testing, Image Processing | Test Automation, Enterprise, Development, CI/CD |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applitools | Checksum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 120 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.4% | +88.7% |
| Total funding | $41.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Strategic | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 24,724 | 4,945 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applitools | Checksum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 15/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applitools | Checksum |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Applitools | Checksum |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads | Not published |
“I just finished a two week pilot of Applitools Eyes and was very very impressed, especially how easily and quickly it works with Selenium IDE. That said, it's more than my current (read: non-existent) QA budget allows for, so wanted to ask ”r/QualityAssurance
Applitools vs Checksum: common questions
Which is better, Applitools or Checksum?
On our 0-100 score Applitools rates higher (62/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applitools and Checksum compare on the numbers?
Applitools leads on our overall score (62/100 against 47/100), domain rating (74/100 against 29/100), headcount (120 against 28), LinkedIn following (24,724 against 4,945). Checksum leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 42/100), headcount growth (+88.7% against -0.4%).
What do real users say about Applitools and Checksum?
Applitools: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/QualityAssurance.
Read the full Applitools review and pricing or the Checksum review and pricing. You can also browse other Applitools alternatives we track.