Applied Spectral Imaging vs iCAD
Applied Spectral Imaging vs iCAD, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applied Spectral Imaging is on 44/100 and iCAD on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Applied Spectral Imaging
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 39/100
iCAD
- our overall score: 55/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 353 against 84
- funding raised: $37.5M against $11.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops automated imaging and analysis platforms for pathology, cytogenetics, and life science research. | AI-powered cancer detection and therapy solutions for early diagnosis and personalized risk assessment. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare, Pathology, MedTech | MedTech, HealthTech, AI-Driven Protein Design, Clinical Trials |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1993 | 1984 |
| Headquarters | Littlehampton, United Kingdom | Nashua, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | 353 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +26.6% |
| Total funding | $11.0M | $37.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Direct Offering |
| Valuation | $60.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,886 | 15,268 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | iCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Looking ahead, Bionano is perfectly positioned to team up with companies like Thermo Fisher, Agilent, and Applied Spectral Imaging…leaders in lab automation, diagnostics, and v”r/OGM_BionanoGenomics
Applied Spectral Imaging vs iCAD: common questions
Which is better, Applied Spectral Imaging or iCAD?
On our 0-100 score iCAD rates higher (55/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applied Spectral Imaging and iCAD compare on the numbers?
Applied Spectral Imaging leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 39/100). iCAD leads on our overall score (55/100 against 44/100), domain rating (53/100 against 43/100), headcount (353 against 84), funding raised ($37.5M against $11.0M).
What do real users say about Applied Spectral Imaging and iCAD?
Applied Spectral Imaging: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/OGM_BionanoGenomics.
Read the full Applied Spectral Imaging review and pricing or the iCAD review and pricing. You can also browse other Applied Spectral Imaging alternatives we track.