Applied Spectral Imaging vs CellaVision
Applied Spectral Imaging vs CellaVision, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applied Spectral Imaging is on 44/100 and CellaVision on 30/100.
Where each one leads
Applied Spectral Imaging
- our overall score: 44/100 against 30/100
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 35/100
CellaVision
- domain rating: 49/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 250 against 84
- LinkedIn following: 19,143 against 13,886
At a glance
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops automated imaging and analysis platforms for pathology, cytogenetics, and life science research. | AI-driven digital hematology microscopy for clinical labs. |
| Category | Medical Imaging, Healthcare, Pathology, MedTech | Medical Imaging, Healthcare AI, Hematology, Deep Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | hardware | services |
| Founded | 1993 | 1994 |
| Headquarters | Littlehampton, United Kingdom | Lund, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | 250 |
| Total funding | $11.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | $60.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13,886 | 19,143 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 30/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 43/100 | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Applied Spectral Imaging | CellaVision |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Looking ahead, Bionano is perfectly positioned to team up with companies like Thermo Fisher, Agilent, and Applied Spectral Imaging…leaders in lab automation, diagnostics, and v”r/OGM_BionanoGenomics
Applied Spectral Imaging vs CellaVision: common questions
Which is better, Applied Spectral Imaging or CellaVision?
On our 0-100 score Applied Spectral Imaging rates higher (44/100 against 30/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applied Spectral Imaging and CellaVision compare on the numbers?
Applied Spectral Imaging leads on our overall score (44/100 against 30/100), agent readiness (44/100 against 35/100). CellaVision leads on domain rating (49/100 against 43/100), headcount (250 against 84), LinkedIn following (19,143 against 13,886).
What do real users say about Applied Spectral Imaging and CellaVision?
Applied Spectral Imaging: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/OGM_BionanoGenomics.
Read the full Applied Spectral Imaging review and pricing or the CellaVision review and pricing. You can also browse other Applied Spectral Imaging alternatives we track.