Applied Machine Learning vs WINT
Applied Machine Learning vs WINT, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applied Machine Learning is on 15/100 and WINT on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Applied Machine Learning
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
WINT
- our overall score: 63/100 against 15/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 55/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 122 against 3
- LinkedIn following: 7,852 against 340
At a glance
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial analytics solutions that monitor worker behavior, environmental conditions, and interactions with industrial objects to generate safety alerts. | AI-powered water intelligence solutions for leak prevention and water management. |
| Category | Industrial, Analytics, Industrial Analytics, Workplace Safety | Industrial, Water Management, IoT, Commercial Property |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 122 |
| Total funding | Not published | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 340 | 7,852 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 15/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 6/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | WINT |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Applied Machine Learning vs WINT: common questions
Which is better, Applied Machine Learning or WINT?
On our 0-100 score WINT rates higher (63/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applied Machine Learning and WINT compare on the numbers?
WINT leads on our overall score (63/100 against 15/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 30/100), domain rating (55/100 against 5/100), headcount (122 against 3), LinkedIn following (7,852 against 340).
Read the full Applied Machine Learning review and pricing or the WINT review and pricing. You can also browse other Applied Machine Learning alternatives we track.