Applied Machine Learning vs Kando
Applied Machine Learning vs Kando, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applied Machine Learning is on 15/100 and Kando on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Applied Machine Learning
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 21/100
Kando
- our overall score: 62/100 against 15/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 5/100
- headcount: 50 against 3
- LinkedIn following: 6,902 against 340
At a glance
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Industrial analytics solutions that monitor worker behavior, environmental conditions, and interactions with industrial objects to generate safety alerts. | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. |
| Category | Industrial, Analytics, Industrial Analytics, Workplace Safety | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3 | 50 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.1% |
| Total funding | Not published | $36.0M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 340 | 6,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 15/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 6/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 5/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applied Machine Learning | Kando |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Applied Machine Learning vs Kando: common questions
Which is better, Applied Machine Learning or Kando?
On our 0-100 score Kando rates higher (62/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applied Machine Learning and Kando compare on the numbers?
Applied Machine Learning leads on agent readiness (30/100 against 21/100). Kando leads on our overall score (62/100 against 15/100), domain rating (31/100 against 5/100), headcount (50 against 3), LinkedIn following (6,902 against 340).
Read the full Applied Machine Learning review and pricing or the Kando review and pricing. You can also browse other Applied Machine Learning alternatives we track.