Applied Compute vs Matillion
Applied Compute vs Matillion, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applied Compute is on 64/100 and Matillion on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Applied Compute
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Matillion
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 462 against 28
- funding raised: $320M against $102M
- LinkedIn following: 108,382 against 4,517
At a glance
| Measure | Applied Compute | Matillion |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Builds custom AI models and 'Specific Intelligence' agent workforces for enterprises using proprietary data. | Cloud-native data integration platform for transforming data into analytics-ready datasets. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, Enterprise Software | Data Integration, ETL, ELT, Cloud Data Warehousing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Manchester, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applied Compute | Matillion |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 462 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +332.9% | Not published |
| Open roles | 295 | Not published |
| Total funding | $102M | $320M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series E |
| Valuation | $100M | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,517 | 108,382 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applied Compute | Matillion |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 61/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 53/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applied Compute | Matillion |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Applied Compute vs Matillion: common questions
Which is better, Applied Compute or Matillion?
On our 0-100 score Matillion rates higher (67/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applied Compute and Matillion compare on the numbers?
Matillion leads on agent readiness (52/100 against 40/100), domain rating (75/100 against 53/100), headcount (462 against 28), funding raised ($320M against $102M), LinkedIn following (108,382 against 4,517).
Read the full Applied Compute review and pricing or the Matillion review and pricing. You can also browse other Applied Compute alternatives we track.