Applicaster vs Zapier
Applicaster vs Zapier, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Applicaster is on 48/100 and Zapier on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Applicaster
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Zapier
- our overall score: 77/100 against 48/100
- agent readiness: 71/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 1,447 against 39
- headcount growth: +17.9% against -3.3%
- funding raised: $1.3B against $41.5M
- LinkedIn following: 360,432 against 5,139
At a glance
| Measure | Applicaster | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Applicaster provides a no/low-code app management platform for content owners and OTT providers to build and manage their video applications. | Zapier automates workflows by connecting web applications, enabling users to move data and automate tasks without coding. |
| Category | Low Code, No Code, OTT, Media | Workflow Automation, Application Integration, Low-Code Development, No-Code Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Applicaster | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 39 | 1,447 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -3.3% | +17.9% |
| Total funding | $41.5M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,139 | 360,432 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Applicaster | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 66/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 87/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | B (71/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Applicaster | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Zendesk |
What users say
| Measure | Applicaster | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“BroadcastAsia: MediaCorp announces new 'Toggle Now TV' developed by Applicaster.”r/denofgeek
Applicaster vs Zapier: common questions
Which is better, Applicaster or Zapier?
On our 0-100 score Zapier rates higher (77/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Applicaster and Zapier compare on the numbers?
Zapier leads on our overall score (77/100 against 48/100), agent readiness (71/100 against 36/100), domain rating (91/100 against 58/100), headcount (1,447 against 39), headcount growth (+17.9% against -3.3%), funding raised ($1.3B against $41.5M), LinkedIn following (360,432 against 5,139).
What do real users say about Applicaster and Zapier?
Applicaster: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/denofgeek.
Read the full Applicaster review and pricing or the Zapier review and pricing. You can also browse other Applicaster alternatives we track.